Thursday, 3 October 2013
Analysing previous students' work
What went well :
*Variety of shots used
*Moved from diegetic to non-diegetic through the video
*Good photo booth idea incorporated
*Narrative was clear
*Fast paced editing matched the pace of the music
*Good use of flash backs
*Costume suits the genre
*Pictures on the wall - good use of mise en scene
Even better if :
*Lip syncing was slightly more accurate at times
*Lighting was fixed
*The bedroom set seemed to small, making the actors look very cramped
What went well :
*Fast paced editing matched the pace of the music
*Variety of shots used
*Appropriate costumes used
*Good use of flashbacks
*Good location for band
*Good framing and composition
Even better if :
*Narrative was more clear
*Use of black and white was justified throughout the video
What went well :
*Appropriate costume used
*Good use of camera
*Good incorporation shots, pan shots in particular
Even better if :
*Lip syncing was more accurate
*Change of location at times
*Confusion between female lip syncing to male's lyrics
*Framing should be taken care of more
What went well :
*Appropriate costumes used
*Well edited
*Pace of editing matched the pace of the music
*Patterns with the background fit in and add more to the video
*Lip syncing was accurate
Even better if :
*Not sure about the black and white theme throughout the whole video, a touch of colour would have been more exciting
What went well :
*Appropriate costumes used
*Good use of flashbacks
*Good lighting throughout the video used where appropriate
*Good affect used by splitting the screen at one point
Even better if :
*Editing was very slow paced and so did not keep up with the fast paced music
*Same narrative shots used throughout, this made it boring at times
Labels:
Research
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment